RRReasoning Referee

BEFORE YOU DECIDE THEY’RE CRAZY

See the reasoning beneath the disagreement.

We call the frameworks, fallacies, biases, evidence gaps, and hidden stakes—without telling you which side to join.

FRAMEWORK CALL01
The Referee, an Aristotle-inspired philosopher in a striped referee shirt, throwing a penalty flag

COMPARED WITH WHAT?

Opportunity Cost

What better alternative does this decision prevent?
01Hear the exchange
02Make the calls
03Ask what moves it forward

WHAT IS REASONING REFEREE?

A guide to the thinking behind disagreements and difficult public issues.

Reasoning Referee is a plain-language tool for understanding why reasonable people can hear the same issue and reach different conclusions. It identifies the reasoning lenses, argument problems, mental shortcuts, missing evidence, and personal or institutional stakes that may be shaping an exchange.

It was made to help people pause before dismissing the other side as foolish, dishonest, or “crazy.” Like a sports referee, it calls what is happening in the exchange and explains the call. It does not choose your political team, assume bad motives, or replace verified facts with an opinion.

1

Listen

Give each side its strongest fair reading.

2

Identify

Name the reasoning, weak spots, and unstated stakes.

3

Move forward

Ask the question or find the evidence that could clarify the dispute.

One important note: people do not need to know the formal name of a framework to use it. Scholars often gave names to patterns of reasoning that people already use naturally.

CURATED DISCUSSIONS

Start with something recognizable.

Each case is short. Every underlined reasoning tool opens a deeper explanation when you want it.

CITY HALL

Illegal fireworks

A REASONING REFEREE ORIGINAL · 2026

Should police be reassigned to enforce the city’s fireworks ban?

Woodcut illustration of fireworks bursting above neighborhood homes and a startled dog
Open discussion

PUBLIC SPACE

Mercer Park encampment

A REASONING REFEREE ORIGINAL · 2026

Should the city close an encampment before enough suitable shelter exists?

Woodcut illustration of a tent beneath a tree in a public park, with a bench and distant city buildings
Open discussion

LOCAL ECONOMY

Street vendors

SCENARIO CONTRIBUTED BY OSCAR SANCHEZ · 2026

Should the city expand street-vending permits when established restaurants say the rules and costs are unequal?

Woodcut illustration of a street-food cart and umbrella beside a neighborhood restaurant storefront
Open discussion

PUBLIC ACCESS

Accessible parking

A REASONING REFEREE ORIGINAL · 2026

Should some accessible spaces be reserved for people who need wheelchair ramps, lifts, or wide-transfer access?

Woodcut illustration of an accessible minivan with an extended wheelchair ramp and striped access aisle
Open discussion

WORKPLACE

The return-to-office divide

A REASONING REFEREE ORIGINAL · 2026

Should employees keep working remotely when leadership says the organization performs better together in person?

Woodcut illustration comparing a home workspace with a shared office meeting table
Open discussion

MEDIA & CULTURE

The AI slop backlash

A REASONING REFEREE ORIGINAL · 2026

When does generative AI help humans create—and when does it replace the human qualities audiences came to experience?

Woodcut illustration of a hand drawing one image beside a computer producing several similar images
Open discussion

TRANSPORTATION & TECHNOLOGY

When the driver disappears

A REASONING REFEREE ORIGINAL · 2026

How quickly should self-driving vehicles be allowed to transform public roads—and what choices should remain human?

Woodcut illustration of a driverless car crossing an urban intersection near a cyclist
Open discussion

ECONOMY & SOCIAL CONTRACT

A floor beneath everyone

A REASONING REFEREE ORIGINAL · 2026

Should every adult receive a dependable basic income with no work requirement or means test?

Woodcut illustration of three equal payment tokens descending from a civic building toward three different hands
Open discussion

YOUR TURN

What disagreement would you like to better understand?

Submit a scenario →

THE COMMUNITY DOCKET

You choose what enters the conversation next.

Vote free among six potential discussions, or submit your own scenario for priority editorial review.

View the Docket →